Two weeks ago we embarked on a little adventure to find out more about quantum computing. Last week I was busy being bombarded by hail atop a mountain for four days. Today, we finally continue on our quest. The first one, not the camping.

So what exactly makes quantum computing so special? In my previous post we discussed the fact that modern day computers work by using a series of 0s and 1s to represent an instruction, which is then processed by an algorithm. Essentially, all an algorithm does is manipulate this string of bits (0s and 1s) and then outputs another string which encodes the result.

Quantum computation makes use of the fact that, on a very small scale, things can simultaneously take on states that we would normally deem mutually exclusive. This quantum effect is known as superposition, and it allows tiny particles such as electrons or photons to be in several places at once. However, we never directly see this phenomena in the ordinary macroscopic world because as soon as the system is observed or measured, it collapses into a single state based on probability. Some of you may be familiar with the Schrödinger’s Cat analogy in which there is a cat in a box which, when opened, gives a 50% chance that the cat is either dead or alive. Until the box is opened, there is no way of determining the state of the cat, so it exists in a superposition of its two possible states, a mixture of both life and death simultaneously. When a measurement is taken by opening the box, the outcome of the cat is determined and it collapses into one of the two states.

So this idea of superposition widens the binary constraints – instead of representing bits, particles are used in quantum computation to represent quantum bits, or as the cool kids call it, qubits. These qubits can represent 0, or 1, or any superposition of those two qubit states; a pair of qubits can be in any superposition of 4 states, and 3 qubits in any of 8. In general, a quantum computer with *n* qubits can be in a superposition of up to 2^{n} different states simultaneously, which massively improves upon the single state that a normal computer can use. This inherent parallelism allows quantum computers to perform a million computations at once, whereas a normal desktop PC can only perform one, giving quantum computers the potential to be millions of times more powerful than today’s most powerful supercomputers.

Quantum computers also use another aspect of quantum mechanics to their advantage, known as entanglement. As we mentioned earlier, a particle’s quantum state can be collapsed from its superposition of many states by observing it in any way. This poses a problem – if we try to look at subatomic particles in our quantum computer, this will bump them and change their value. Qubits in superposition, holding many simultaneous values, will assume the value of either 0 or 1, when we look at them. This effectively turns our fabulous quantum computer into a boring, mundane digital computer. To overcome this, entanglement provides a potential answer which makes it able to make measurements of the qubits indirectly so that the system’s integrity is preserved. Quantum entanglement is where two or more particles are generated or interact in such ways that they share a quantum state. For example, if we have two entangled particles that are spinning in opposite directions such that their total spin is known to be zero, and we measure one of the particles spinning anticlockwise, we now know, without further measurement, that the other will be spinning clockwise. Using this phenomena, scientists are able to know the value of qubits without actually observing them. Neat, huh?

Stay tuned, there’s more to come eventually. After a short interlude. But it will come, I promise.

*Harvey*

Yes it is possible for me to know the value of a qubit or even get the value of a qubit within a multidimensional array without “labotomizing (0 or 1-ing) it via the observer-dependent TSI (time-space illusion) fabric. However persistence (with or without entanglement with a non-local time) mightbe a problem as how do you noninvasively probestate(qubit q) when q has undergone an (intentional or unexpected) interaction that chmods its state (superpositioned or not) without observer’s algorithms or prediction mechanisms being aware of this or being able to assume this? I ask this question because I actually do know how and have been doing it since I was 25 but I dont understand how the QM world can still be stuck in 2016 where it is… Must be the high-function autism exploit I ran on my cobrain at age 15 lol;

LikeLiked by 1 person

First of all, thank you for taking the time to read my post and posing such an eloquent and thought-provoking question. I’d just like to say that I am currently a high-school student and I write these scientific posts purely out of my own interest. This means that my working knowledge of these topics is not as in-depth as perhaps you perceived it to be. Therefore, I am sorry that I am unable to come up with a satisfactory answer to your question. However, I’d be very happy to hear your explanation.

~Harvey

LikeLiked by 1 person

Hey there, actually I’m just a lonely bachelor that happens to like PC Gaming, audio engineering, maybe some QM but to be honest I think my knowledge of QM was sorta automatic in that I always “thought” like that since birth. In fact, I didnt even know there was a field dedicated to it let alone a name for it untuil about a year ago. I had just assumed it was common knowledge or something; Either way I’m probably not nearly as vibrant, focused and passionate about things as you are, but thats because I essentially live in solitary confinement, in other words I have no obligations, infinite free time (I retired at age 24) and, of course, no one to share life with and thus everything essentially means nothing. My name is David by the way. I live in Louisiana, just turned 36, and was quite shocked to get a response from you so quickly considering the age of the blog. I hope you are doing well. Will you be starting your freshman year in college next week or are you a senior in high school? btw my fb name is infinetik

LikeLike